<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><id>tag:themikkster.blog.co.uk,2009-11-10:/</id><title>At the Edge of the World</title><link rel="self" href="http://themikkster.blog.co.uk/feed/atom/comments/"/><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://themikkster.blog.co.uk/"/><generator version="1.0">MokoFeed</generator><updated>2009-11-10T09:37:25+01:00</updated><entry><id>tag:themikkster.blog.co.uk,2007-03-17:/2007/02/28/unweaving_the_rainbow~1822079/#c3050646</id><title>In response to:Unweaving the Rainbow</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://themikkster.blog.co.uk/2007/02/28/unweaving_the_rainbow~1822079/#c3050646"/><author><name>secback</name></author><published>2007-03-17T11:49:58+01:00</published><updated>2007-03-17T11:49:58+01:00</updated><content type="html">Come on Michael, the world is waiting ...</content></entry><entry><id>tag:themikkster.blog.co.uk,2007-03-07:/2007/02/28/unweaving_the_rainbow~1822079/#c2969863</id><title>In response to:Unweaving the Rainbow</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://themikkster.blog.co.uk/2007/02/28/unweaving_the_rainbow~1822079/#c2969863"/><author><name>Dave</name></author><published>2007-03-07T14:37:17+01:00</published><updated>2007-03-07T14:37:17+01:00</updated><content type="html">Nope, I don't get it either.  Is he saying "don't you know who I am?", like the celebrity getting done for shoplifting?  Or is this another one of those confusing bits of the Bible that can be made to say lots of different things, according to need?</content></entry><entry><id>tag:themikkster.blog.co.uk,2007-02-28:/2007/02/28/unweaving_the_rainbow~1822079/#c2915232</id><title>In response to:Unweaving the Rainbow</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://themikkster.blog.co.uk/2007/02/28/unweaving_the_rainbow~1822079/#c2915232"/><author><name>secback</name></author><published>2007-02-28T18:18:18+01:00</published><updated>2007-02-28T18:18:18+01:00</updated><content type="html">I just looked up the reference in John, and it seems to be Jesus burbling on about a well. What exactly is the point being made?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
With regard to Dawkins' financial rewards, a large slice of his income goes back into the Richard Dawkins Foundation, which promotes secularism worldwide. And he wouldn't be the first person to make money from religion. I wonder how much the bishop made? Not that it's an argument for or against either book.</content></entry><entry><id>tag:themikkster.blog.co.uk,2007-02-28:/2007/02/28/unweaving_the_rainbow~1822079/#c2915004</id><title>In response to:Unweaving the Rainbow</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://themikkster.blog.co.uk/2007/02/28/unweaving_the_rainbow~1822079/#c2915004"/><author><name>davidjohn</name></author><published>2007-02-28T17:47:38+01:00</published><updated>2007-02-28T17:47:38+01:00</updated><content type="html">Take Dawkins with a pinch of salt. He writes well and argues coherently but hasn't read [ or perhaps he has misunderstood ] the first letter of John chapter 4 v 7 - 12. I doubt if he has read the late Bishop John Robinson's book ' Honest to God '. Anyway he is probably making a lot of money purveying his anti religious views.</content></entry></feed>
